Archive-name: pets/safe-bedding-faq
Posting-Frequency: monthly
Version: 2.0


Safe Pet Bedding FAQ [Draft]

For rodents, rabbits, and other small animals
Version: 2.0 [Draft] 

History and Introduction

The original Safe Bedding FAQ was created and posted by Emily Rocke, with much of its information provided by Debbie "The Rat Lady" Ducommun. The Safe Pet Bedding FAQ, maintained by seagull@netcom.com, is based upon this original work, although several technical and cosmetic changes have been made.

This FAQ is posted once a month to the following newsgroups:

A current version of this FAQ can be found: Legal disclaimer: This article is provided as-is without any warranties, expressed or implied. While every effort has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this article, the  author assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein.
 

Table of Contents

  1. What's wrong with cedar and pine?
  2. What are some alternatives?
  3. How do I contact the manufacturers of these products?

1. What's wrong with cedar and pine?

The problems with softwood shavings such as pine and cedar stem from the natural, armotic chemicals called phenols that give the woods their natural aroma.  These phenols interact with the liver and respiratory system in the body, potentially producing unwanted and harmful side-effects. Articles containing more information, and medical references for the claims stated herein, can be found at the end of this section.

The liver being re-written

The respiratory system

The effects of cedar and pine on the respiratory system is clear, and well documented through several years of scienific research: the natural chemicals present in softwoods can damage the respiratory tract, leading to chronic respiratory disease and asthma. Although most of this research describes the effects of wood products in humans, it should be noted that the effects are likely to be more pronounced in small animals, who have a much greater sense of smell, and are therefore more sensitive to respiratory irritants.

The primary irritant in cedar is plicatic acid, present in highest concentrations in western red cedar. Although the mechanism is not fully understood, plicatic acid has been shown to cause asthma, and inflammatory and allergic reactions after long-term exposures. The natural irritant in pine, called abietic acid, also exhibits allergic responses, though these are much weaker than those induced by plicatic acid. However, the oxidation of abietic acid does form compounds that are rather potent allergens.

Pine vs. Cedar

For fairness, it should be pointed out that the evidence against pine is not generally considered to be as compelling as the evidence against cedar, and the claim that pine is unsafe as bedding is more disputed. As a general rule of thumb, pine is arguably less dangerous than cedar, but if you want to be safe, it's best to avoid both if at all possible.

Further reading and references

Additional references

2. What are some alternatives?

If you wish to use wood shavings as litter, hardwoods such as aspen are one alternative to pine and cedar. Unlike softwoods, hardwoods do not contain any phenols. Similarly, softwoods that have had their phenols removed via a drying process, such as is the case with kiln-dried pine, are also safe for use.

Gentle Touch Litter consists of pellets made from aspen wood that are very absorbent and excellent at controlling odor.

Corn-cob bedding, available in most pet stores or feed and garden stores, is also non-toxic and safe for use.  However, it should be noted that this bedding is more prone to growing mold than other beddings, and is rather hard. There have also been instances of smaller animals, such as rats, choking on the corn cob pieces.

There are numerous safe beddings made from paper, recycled newspaper, grasses and other organic materials. The paper-based products are especially effective in that they inhibit the formation of ammonia, which helps keep odors under control. Some of these products are less commonly found in pet stores, though most of them can be ordered by your pet store, feed and garden or veterinarian.  Some companies will even ship directly to your home.

Of the paper-based beddings, CareFRESH is arguably the most popular. It is created from wood pulp fibers that are too short to make paper, and is processed to the appearance and texture of shredded egg cartons. It is soft on the feet, making it a great choice for bedding.

Recycled newspaper beddings such as Yesterday's News, Crown Animal Bedding and Bio-Flush are pelleted beddings that are extremely absorbant and excellent at odor control.  Yesterday's News comes in both regular and soft-texture pellets. For animals that use litter pans, pelleted beddings are fine as-is, but animals that live in their litter may need a layer of softer bedding (such as timothy hay) on top of the pellet base to stay comfortable. Only a thin layer of pellets is needed as bedding; anything more than that is wasted.

Eco-Bedding consists of crinkled strips of kraft paper (brown paper one grade below grocery bags).

Critter Country is a pelleted bedding made from wheat grass. The manufacturer claims that these pellets actually prevent the formation of ammonia.

Finally, timothy hay makes a safe bedding, although if you use it as a food source also, it's a good idea to put the portion of hay which is used for food somewhere that's difficult to climb into and that's differentiated from the rest of the bedding. Hay can usually be otained from a feed and gaden store, or directly from a farmer, but if you have trouble locating fresh timothy in your area, see the contact information for the Oxbow Hay Company, below.
 


3. How do I contact the manufacturers of these products?

Here are the names and phone numbers of some of the makers of safe nontoxic beddings, compiled by Debbie "The Rat Lady" Ducommun:
 
"Unlike pine and cedar shavings, these products contain no toxins, and are safe if eaten.  Most of these products, especially the pelleted litters, are most efficient if you use only a thin layer.  Using a thick layer is wasteful."

Questions? Comments? Constructive criticism? Send mail to seagull@netcom.com.