Math Mutation 64: Exponents Squared Back in school, you probably recall that one of the earliest arithmetic operations you learned was addition. Then the concept was extended to multiplication: take a number x, and add it to itself a bunch of times. A logical further step was exponents: take a number x, and then multiply it by itself a bunch of times. And you probably stopped there-- while your math classes went off in various other directions, you didn't really learn any additional operator on this 'ladder'. But why should we stop there? If multiple repeated additions become multiplication, and multiple repeated multiplications become exponents, then what do multiple repeated exponents become? It might surprise you to learn that there are futher operations in this series, though they usually don't bother to teach them in school. After exponentiation comes what is known as "tetration". Tetration is usually symbolized with a number drawn to the upper left of another number, as opposed to the upper right used for exponents. Let's look at an example: what is 2 tetrated to the 4th? We would draw this as a 2 with a little 4 to the upper left side. This is equivalent to 2 to the 2nd to the 2nd to the 2nd power. Be careful here-- we need to start expanding at the uppermost exponent, otherwise we are effectively just multiplying the exponents together. So 2 tetrated to the 4th becomes 2 to the 2 to the 4th, or 2 to the 16th, or 65536. Needless to say, on positive whole numbers, tetration causes values to grow incredibly fast. This probably helps explain why it's not too practical in real life: after all, the simple operation of exponentiation allows us to concisely express the number of atoms in the universe, approximately 10 to the 80th power, or a 1 with 80 zeroes. In contrast, if we look at the relatively simple tetration value or 10 tetrated to the 3rd, this is 10 to the 10 to the 10, which is 10 to the 10 billionth power, or a 1 with ten billion zeroes after it. I couldn't even begin describing 10 tetrated to the 80th in any comprehensible form, other than just saying "10 tetrated to the 80th". It's hard to imagine a real-life application that needs such immense numbers. But even without real-life applications, there are some mathematicians that find tetration a very interesting topic to study. On small numbers, it can have some bizarre properties. For example, get out a calculator and try calculating some tetrations of the square root of 2. root-2 tetrated to the 2nd, or root-2 to the root-2 power, is approximately 1.63. root-2 tetrated to the 3rd is aproximately 1.76. And as you increase the tetration, you will find that bizarrely, root-2 tetrated to higher and higher values always gets closer and closer to 2! So in effect, root-2 tetrated to infinity is just 2, instead of growing huge like you would expect. In addition to converging on small numbers, there has also been extensive study into the properties of tetration on complex numbers, which leads to lots of pretty multicolored pictures that you can see linked in the show notes. There is actually a registered web domain, "tetration.org", devoted entirely to the study of this operation, as well as some other sites centered on this topic. And, as you probably suspected already, tetration is just the beginning. Mathematicians with lots of time on their hands have defined further operations in the series: just as tetration is a chain of exponents, an operation called "pentation" is a chain of tetrations, "hexation" is a chain of pentations, and so on. This general series of definitions is known as the "hyper-operation sequence". As with tetration, none of these have any real-life applications, as far as I can tell with a little web searching. But has that ever stopped mathematicians before? This whole class of operations, however, is actually a subset of a general operation that is known as the "Ackermann Function", defined by German mathematician Wilhelm Ackermann in the 1920's, which does have some significance in theoretical computer science. So, at some level, these hyper-operations do have a tenuous connection to reality. And this has been your math mutation for today. References: