It's not "humanity" we want. I don't care if the news comes from a goddamn robot. I just don't want to watch some distracted fucker trying to calculate ad revenue in his head while he reads carefully-spun text from the teleprompter.Here's what we want: we want the news. Not a bunch of splutter and mist. Not some jerk in a suit acting human. Not the marketing-department-approved revision. Not the shrink-wrapped and sugar-coated political agenda. Not novocaine for our owies and boo-boos. Just tell us what the fuck is happening. Who-what-when-where-why. We can figure out for ourselves how we feel about it.
Check out Ananova for a VNR (Virtual News Reader). Not a robot, but the next best thing.
Posted by: Jabba the Tutt on September 17, 2002
The only minor quibble I would take with that statement is trusting the newsreader with the 'why' of any items. It used to be one could trust them with that aspect, too, but not anymore!
Posted by: MommaBear on September 17, 2002
Google News, baby:
"This page was generated entirely by computer algorithms without human editors.
No humans were harmed or even used in the creation of this page."
Posted by: Eric Means on September 24, 2002